Read the winning piece of our 2025 Nonfiction Contest “Through the Mirror” by Jessie Cato selected by Lucy Ives.

Read

William Empson

William Empson (1906-1984) is best known for his first work, Seven Types of Ambiguity: A Study of Its Effects on English Verse (1930). He was an English poet and supported the school of literary criticism known as New Criticism through his many works and his critical process. Empson encouraged a close and detailed reading of works and was well known for his ability to explain meaning in poetic language.

Nonfiction

Spring 1958

Tom Jones

By William Empson

I had been meaning to write about Tom Jones before, but this essay bears the marks of shock at what I found said about the book by recent literary critics, […]

Nonfiction

Summer 1957

Donne the Space Man

By William Empson

Why then should witless man so far misween That nothing is, but that which he hath secnr What if within the moon’s fair shining sphere, What if in every other […]

Book Reviews

Winter 1954

The Pride of Othello

By William Empson

Flaming Minister by G. R. Elliott. Duke. $4.50. This massive book on Othello follows the text almost line by line, repeating the few theses it has to offer at every […]

Nonfiction

Spring 1951

Sense in the Prelude

By William Empson

One does not think of the poetry of Wordsworth, even the parts which expound his philosophy, as depending on a concentrated richness of single words. There are of course “key” […]

Nonfiction

Autumn 1950

Communication

By William Empson

George Herbert and Miss Tuve Sirs, Miss Rosamond Tuve’s article “On Herbert’s Sacrifice” in the Kenyon Review for Winter 1950 makes some good points against the way I wrote about […]

My Credo: A Symposium of Critics

Autumn 1950

IV. The Verbal Analysis

By William Empson

When I was asked by letter to contribute to the symposium from Peking, my first impulse was to say that I didn’t believe in having any Credo; a critic ought […]

The Kenyon Review Credos

The Verbal Analysis

By William Empson

From The Kenyon Review, Autumn 1950, Vol. XII, No. 4 When I was asked by letter to contribute to the symposium from Peking, my first impulse was to say that […]