Read the winning piece of our 2025 Nonfiction Contest “Through the Mirror” by Jessie Cato selected by Lucy Ives.

Read

Spring 2003 • Vol. XXV No. 2 • Nonfiction |

The Well-Made World of the O. Henrys, 1961-2000

Taken together the O. Henry Prize Stories volumes of the last eighty years, under four major editorships, provide a kind of case study—a unique opportunity to look into the form of American short fiction. This is particularly true of the forty years that have followed editor Harry Hansen’s O. Henry Award anthology, First Prize Stories: 1919-1960. Here we have the rare chance to perceive a remarkable bridge between modern and postmodern art. Much more than forty years seems to separate our multicultural and postmodern age from the one characterized by modernists and the special trappings of the 1960s, which included, say, political protests. However, these award stories in this particular four-decade period usher forward common themes, evolutionary trends, emergent traditions, as well as specific writers, which develop a sense of continuity.

The O. Henry awards were developed as a way of acknowledging excellence in American short fiction, but it was not until 1932 that the volumes took steps to assure that artfulness of craft was stressed over such standard storytelling devices as “surprise endings” or twist in plot, which were characteristic of the prize’s namesake. As Hansen writes in his introduction to his 1919-1960 anthology, “The judges sought originality, excellence in characterization, skill in organization of plot, power in moving emotions, and although honoring O. Henry, made demands he would have been unable to meet” (xi). For a while in the 1950s, the sequence became associated with the celebrated University of Iowa creative writing workshops—a link which gave further credibility to the stories’ stature as works of art—but after 1959, the O. Henrys severed all academic associations and became known as simply the best fiction available. The editorship of William Abrahams—novelist, poet, critic, and biographer—covered the remarkably long period 1967-1996. In 1998, when Abrahams died, Don Skiles in the Los Angeles Times Book Review wrote that the ascent of the O. Henry awards, from 1965 on, “correspond[s] with an amazing renaissance in the short story—a form, like jazz, that Americans have had a large hand in shaping” (“William Abrahams” 2).

Already have an account? Log in

Join KR for even more to read.

Sign up for a free account and read any five pieces a month.
Sign Up and Read for Free



Or become a subscriber today and get complete, immediate access to our digital archives at every subscription level.

Read More

Miserere

By Michael Waters

We’re bathing together when Alina kneels in steam to reveal crimped flaps of skin, drawn shades the surgeons have fashioned: system of pulleys worked by little metal wheels screwed into […]

Upcoming
Workshops

Subscribe

Your free registration with The Kenyon Review includes access to exclusive content, early access to program registration, and more.

Donate

With your support, we’ll continue 
to cultivate talent and publish extraordinary literature from diverse voices around the world.